Real-Time Process Guidance

These days I’m involved automating transport requests process executed in Road Haulage Industry. This process is executed like broker process in share trading markets. People in the contact center receive a lot of requests, most are updated on hourly basis, the shipper changes quantities faster than the broker can fill a truck completely, and the broker needs to replay scheduling and planning process. The broker’s goal is to maximize percent of truckload capacity utilized and minimize miles of unload rate. There are some more but for case these are the most important. When the truck is full or almost full transport instructions are sent to the transport company and the truck pick up the merchandise and starts delivering.

The example I bring is candidate for real time process guidance like Clay Richardson suggests because systems can provide help calculating complex algorithms do deal with such volatile environment.  But wait, there still is a lot of human intervention. It makes me resembles the May 6th flash crash. You can have a powerful system detecting patterns in trading sessions but ultimately Speedy Maria needs to make decisions on the results system is suggesting. Ultimately going back to the transport request the system can indicate some kind of optimized itinerary but road conditions, urgency, weather conditions or other unpredictable factors can ruin what the system tell us to do. Thus is necessary that Speedy Maria makes some human decisions because if she is aligned with customer needs it will do the right thing.  Let the system process huge amounts of data simultaneously that is what systems are for, give the opportunity to humans use our knowledge make the decisions.

You can access others point of view on this ebizQ discussion.


6 thoughts on “Real-Time Process Guidance

    • Michael:

      I believe that technology is necessary to organize work rather trying to take control imposed by organizational structure. This real time process guidance looks like a new hype concept like the rise of the super intelligence system. Organizations need to understand how knowledge work is executed rather than bringing super tools that constrains the way people think and perform work.

  1. Pingback: Adaptive Process Guidance « End to End BPM

  2. I take APG to be simply guidance, and allowing the user the freedom to make their own decisions based on real time need. If the user feels the process needs updating for others to potentially follow in the future, then the adaptive capabilities are there for the user to take advantage of…

    The concept of guidance is just that, process guidance, not enforcment or rigidity, nor reliance on automated calculations when not needed….

    I think the drive here is towards empowerment, and I really hope that it is not interpretted as anything else…

    • Andrew:

      I fully agree with your perspective, really, but the way a smart manager enables people to work on an empowered way it’s still BPM, the way people execute work the techique, can be strutured or an adaptive approach.

  3. ACM encompasses adaptive process gudance. It doesn’t enforce a certain flow. So why do you give it a different name? But maybe the reason is that what is described is not adaptive but simply ‘dynamic’ meaning that the user can change the execution of the current process instance. I don’t see the process innovation that is the key element of ACM , where users can modify the templates for future execution. Regards, Max

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s